Home
February 2010 March 2010 April 2010
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 9 1 2 3 4 5 6
Week 10 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Week 11 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Week 12 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Week 13 28 29 30 31

Show Comments PDF Print E-mail

ICS 2006 - ABST[153] ARE DETRUSOR OVERACTIVITY AND “INCREASED BLADDER SENSATION” BOTH PART OF THE SAME SPECTRUM OF BLADDER DYSFUNCTION?

Haylen B1, Chetty N2, Logan V 3, Schulz S3, Verity L3, Zhou J4, Law M5

1. ST VINCENTS CLINIC, SYDNEY. AUSTRALIA., 2. ST VINCENTS HOSPITAL, SYDNEY. AUSTRALIA.,

3. ST VINCENTS CLINIC, SYDNEY. AUSTRALIA, 4. UNIVERSITY OF NSW, SYDNEY. AUSTRALIA., 5. UNIVERSITY OF NSW, SYDNEY. AUSTRALIA

Hypothesis / aims of study Historically, the diagnosis of “sensory urgency” was discontinued as a term by the ICS in 2003. This followed 25 years of continuous clinical and academic usage. It had been suggested that “sensory urgency” was an early form of detrusor overactivity (DO). The equivalent current term would appear to be “increased bladder sensation” (IBS). The study aims to compare the clinical and urodynamic associations of IBS and DO.

Study design, materials and methods 592 women attending for an initial urogynaecological / urodynamic assessment took part in this prospective study. In addition to a full clinical assessment, all women underwent free uroflowmetry, RUV measurement (by vaginal ultrasound [1]) and multichannel filling and voiding cystometry. Data was separated into those having (i) neither IBS or DO); (ii) IBS (iii) DO. Apart from prevalence figures, comparative associations were sought for (iii) age; (iv) parity; (v) presenting symptoms; (vi) presence of at least 1 documented urinary tract infection (UTI) in the previous 12 months;

(vii) 2 or more (recurrent) documented UTI in the previous 12 months; (viii) prior hysterectomy; (ix) prior continence surgery (x) menopause (xi) menopause and HRT use; (xii) sign of clinical stress leakage; (xiii) retroverted uterus; (xiv) anterior vaginal prolapse; (xv) uterine prolapse; (xvi) posterior vaginal prolapse; (xvii) apical vaginal prolapse; (xviii, xix) maximum, average urine flow rate (MUFR, AUFR) centiles, Liverpool Nomograms [2]; (xx) median residual urine volume (RUV) mls; (xxi,xxii) voiding difficulty: VD1,VD2 (MUFR, AUFR under 10th centile Liverpool Nomogram and/or RUV >30mls); (xxiii) diagnosis of urodynamic stress incontinence (USI); (xxiv) diagnosis of uterine and/or vaginal prolapse (grade >0).

Results:
Table 1 shows that the clinical and urodynamic profiles for women with IBS and DO are very similar. The only
significant difference is the presence of the symptom of urge incontinence (p=0.023) and (by definition) involuntary
detrusor contractions during filling cystometry, in women with DO.

Interpretation of results The clinical and urodynamic profiles of IBS and DO are very similar. Women with either IBS or DO are less likely to have symptoms, signs or diagnoses of stress incontinence (USI) or prolapse than women with neither IBS or DO.

Concluding message IBS and DO appear to be part of the same spectrum of bladder dysfunction. The difference in median age may point to IBS being an earlier form of DO.

1: Brit J Urol , 1989,64:347-349

2: Brit J Urol, 1989, 64:21-30

No or DO) (IBS IBS DO p-value IBS vs. DO
Number of patients 441 77 74
Age (Median) 59 (16-98) 54 (22-90) 56 (23-91) 0.368
Parity (median) 2 (0-9) 2 (0-7) 1.5 (0-6) 0.126
Presenting symptoms
Stress incontinence 266 (60%) 44 (57%) 33 (45%) 0.124
Urge incontinence 192 (44%) 39 (51%) 51 (69%) 0.023*
Voiding difficulty 44 (10%) 8 (10%) 11 (15%) 0.407
Frequency 124 (28%) 38 (49%) 34 (46%) 0.675
Nocturia 74 (17%) 27 (35%) 25 (34%) 0.868
Urgency 114 (26%) 24 (31%) 29 (39%) 0.302
Prolapse 149 (34%) 19 (25%) 13 (18%) 0.285
UTI
1 or more 138 (31%) 34 (44%) 24 (32%) 0.139
2 or more 95 (22%) 19 (25%) 12 (16%) 0.198
Prior hysterectomy 162 (37%) 17 (22%) 18 (24%) 0.744
Prior continence surgery 80 (18%) 7 (9%) 7 (9%) 0.938
Menopause 317 (72%) 46(60%) 47 (64%) 0.634
Menopause and HRT 220 (50%) 35 (45%) 36 (49%) 0.694
Clinical stress leakage (sign) 335 (76%) 38 (49%) 50 (54%) 0.563
Retroverted uterus (uterus present) 97 (37%) 14 (25%) 14 (25%) 0.913
Prolapse
Anterior vaginal (Grade>0) 270 (61%) 31 (40%) 28 (38%) 0.760
Uterine (Grade>0) 306 (69%) 38 (49%) 31 (42%) 0.358
Posterior vaginal (Grade>0) 261 (59%) 26 (34%) 20 (27%) 0.368
Apical vaginal (Grade>0) 121 (27%) 8 (10%) 6 (8%) 0.629
MUFR (Median) 15.65 12.3 12.35 0.762
AUFR (Median) 7.05 5.9 6.75 0.873
RUV (median – mls) 29.56 11.12 9.22 0.505
VD1 181 (41%) 26 (34%) 23 (31%) 0.726
VD2 189 (43%) 23 (30%) 20 (27%) 0.700
USI 343 (78%) 42 (55%) 43 (58%) 0.660
Prolapse (Grade>0) 234 (65%) 33 (47%) 24 (36%) 0.179

FUNDING: NONE DISCLOSURES: NONE HUMAN SUBJECTS: This study did not need ethical approval because Ehthics committee approval was not required. but followed the Declaration of Helsinki Informed consent was obtained from the patients.

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
Bookmark and Share
< Prev   Next >

Member's Section

Login

Sign Up

Quick Search