Home
October 2009 November 2009 December 2009
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 45 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Week 46 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Week 47 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Week 48 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Week 49 29 30

24th WCE 2006 - MP18-29: The Effect of Bladder Neck Sparing on Continence After Robotic Prostatectomy Show Comments PDF Print E-mail
  
Saturday, 19 August 2006
N Abraham1, V Ferlise , J Lee , DI Lee 1 2 1
1University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA,
2Urology Associates of North Texas, Arlington,USA

Introduction:
The role of bladder neck sparing in the recovery of continence after radical prostatectomy is unclear. We reviewed our experience in patient before and after a change in technique to more completely spare the bladder neck.

Method: A group of patients with at least 1 year followup had a bladder neck
sparing (BNS) procedure performed (n=80). This group was compared to a
retrospective cohort (n=80), where the bladder neck was intentionally left wider open, in regards to pad free status at 3 months and one year post robotic prostatectomy.

Result: In the group that underwent a successful BNS procedure, continence
rates were 54% and 89% at 3 months and 1 year respectively. In the non BNS group, rates were 48% and 90% respectively. The BNS could be reliably
performed with experience leaving a small bladder neck that was seemed technically easier to sew to the urethra. One positive bladder neck margin was encountered early in the learning curve of the BNS procedure.

Conclusion: Bladder neck sparing in this series does not improve continence either early or late after robotic prostatectomy. BNS can be easily performed with experience, however likely only benefits the surgeon by easing the urethrovesical anastomosis.

Reader Comments

Please log-in or register in order to submit comments.

Powered by AkoComment!

 
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest


 

Bookmark and Share
< Prev   Next >

Member's Section

Login

Sign Up

Quick Search